Richard Gage Resigns From Architects & Engineers (The Fringe Elements Involved)

On September 3rd 2021, just 8 days before the 20th anniversary of the September 11th 2001 terrorist attack's, Richard Gage the President & CEO of the largest 9/11 truth group in the world, Architects & Engineers, has resigned his position. Gage has also turned down to speak at the September 11th Global Live Stream from the Lawyers' Committee for 9/11 Inquiry. In this video i give an explanation as to what led up his his resignation and the fringe elements involved with Architects & Engineers, and how they influenced his removal.

Gage allowed the "no plane at the Pentagon" nuts, almost certainly disinformation artists, into the organisation and now he's resigned over tensions with these people - according to the video. Many people warned about this situation over the years. If it is still possible, action needs to be taken to fire anyone involved with the "no planes" group. They all need to go along with anyone that supported their baseless claims.

The problem has been building for more than ten years. It should have been obvious that the 'no planes' people were highly detrimental additions to AE911truth - something further highlighted by the unacceptable behaviour they displayed towards their critics. Their actions were a massive red flag. The nonsense peddling jackals viciously attacked people within the organisation, people like David Chandler, who presented solid evidence to debunk the no planes at the Pentagon misinformation. Gage and members of the board should have fired all those that supported the faulty position and supported people like Chandler. 

According to truth activist and researcher Ryan Dawson, who directly contacted Gage, he first allowed in the nuts because they brought more supporters to the organisation and more money. It seems like financing played a large role. However, this was done at the expense of their most important element, which was the furtherance of a credible, and academically supported, critique of the official account (centered around the destruction of the Twin Towers and Building 7).

The clip here mentions the writings of Government connected power Lawyer Cass Sunstein, who, in a book, called for the dismantling of groups pushing conspiracy theories that he considered dangerous to the establishment. The Wikipedia entry on this matter explains it thusly:
Sunstein co-authored a 2008 paper with Adrian Vermeule, titled "Conspiracy Theories," dealing with the risks and possible government responses to conspiracy theories resulting from "cascades" of faulty information within groups that may ultimately lead to violence. In this article they wrote, "The existence of both domestic and foreign conspiracy theories, we suggest, is no trivial matter, posing real risks to the government's antiterrorism policies, whatever the latter may be." They go on to propose that, "the best response consists in cognitive infiltration of extremist groups",[42] where they suggest, among other tactics, "Government agents (and their allies) might enter chat rooms, online social networks, or even real-space groups and attempt to undermine percolating conspiracy theories by raising doubts about their factual premises, causal logic or implications for political action."
And so it looks like this actually happened. It's not surprising when one considers past situations where the Government, or people connected, helped dismantle the most effective opposition groups from within.

The first incident that comes to mind is the CIA's involvement with the high powered NICAP UFO group back in the 1960s. Today we know that the CIA had a number of people involved with running NICAP who eventually participated in the removal of the group's founder and driving force - Major Donald Keyhoe. He wanted to put more pressure on the Government while others preferred a more respectful approach. It's more complicated than that, but it's unlikely the CIA agents within NICAP went out of their way to help advance the organisation (perhaps only on a superficial level). For more information see this link: The CIA's Infiltration of NICAP

It should be remembered that during the late 60s  the CIA was also actively engaged in stopping independent inquiry into the JKF assassination. We have their own document where they outlined methods to discourage investigation by the public by weaponising the term "conspiracy theory" - using it as a prerogative. It was used to imply that there was no evidence to back up accusations of a cover-up, and those advocating such a thing were mentally ill. It was a method of psychological warfare to discourage the public from looking at the publicly available information and thinking logically about the official narrative. 

It wasn't just the CIA engaged in undermining opposition groups in the past. The FBI also ran a program known as COINTELPRO that, according to Wikipedia; was a series of covert and illegal projects conducted by the United States Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) aimed at surveilling, infiltrating, discrediting, and disrupting domestic American political organizations.

So what happened to AE911truth is not a surprise at all. The writing has been on the wall for a long time. The way to counter such ploys is to follow the most rational approach when it comes to the evidence and exclude people who step too far outside logic-driven best practice. There will always be some level of political disagreement within groups, but when it comes to research driven projects, and where people are clearly standing upon baseless positions, then those people MUST GO.  

Click the link to learn aboutt your rights and how to protect them!

Y'all can go straight to hell with that vaccine pass. I'll stick a HIPPA violation straight up in your ass, fast. Oh, you ain't hippa compliant? I bet your store would have said you were in 2018. I don't buy it. I'm defiant. I'll pull the ADA card, bitch I wish you would try it...

Afghanistan disaster: 9/11 Truth more relevant than ever

2021 Overview from Reinvestigate 9/11

It's widely agreed that 9/11 got NATO into Afghanistan. With the retreat from Afghanistan, 9/11 is more relevant than for many years


London leafleting dates. Aug 28 and Sept 10

9/11 News. Afghanistan: 9/11 Truth more relevant than ever

9/11 Campaign News: Court cases in UK and US, 9/11 Film Festival

New Books, graphic novel,

Internet Resources List

2 key videos

London Leafleting dates:

August 28 RI911 will be leafleting at the London Freedom March. This does not imply agreement with all the many groups there. To meet up, go to Central London and call Roy on 07966 334920

September 10 sees RI911 leafleting at the BBC (as Sept 11 would be a Saturday).

If you plan to organise something, please let us know asap as we are preparing leaflets and can notify our lists.

News Updates

It's widely agreed that 9/11 got NATO into Afghanistan. With the retreat from Afghanistan, 9/11 should be more relevant than ever.

Up to now the media have let Washington get away with a 9/11 narrative of  "surprise attack out of the blue ", long since contradicted by whistleblowers and official reports.

Proper media examination of 9/11 could have stopped this imperial project either at the time or at least when the Iraqi WMD deception was exposed.

The failure to punish anyone for the 9/11 and Iraq deceptions has contributed to a culture of disbelief. After being lied to people are inclined to doubt any unwelcome news.

After more than fifteen years in custody there is still no trial date for Khaled Sheikh Mohammed the alleged mastermind whose evidence under torture was used by the 9/11 Commission for a large part of their narrative

Meanwhile in Syria Al Qaeda, supposed to be the big enemy post-9/11, is alive and well, occupying large parts of Idlib province and backed by scores of "observation posts" controlled by NATO member Turkey


9/11 Campaign News

UK 9/11 relative Matt Campbell prepares to go to court, calling for new inquest into his brother, murdered on 9/11, on the grounds of the new evidence that has arisen since the original inquest

In New York Saudi officials are being questioned about their links to the 9/11 attacks by lawyers acting for families of the victims. However under court ordered rules most of the information is secret.

US Lawmakers have presented legislation to over ride 9/11 secrecy imposed by three Presidents. But the key relatives group September 11 Advocates have criticized the plans as full of loopholes and told Biden: don't come unless you keep your promise and release the secret papers first.

AE911 starts new court actions, saying the White House controlled technical agency NIST has yet to provide adequate answers to the still open questions on how the three (sic) buildings collapsed. Richard Gage of Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth says this amounts to an illegal coverup. AE911 lawyers committee are petitioning various courts including the Supreme Court to intervene on this

The AE911 Lawyers Committee is also appealing the The New York DA's decision not to open a Grand Jury investigation into the original crime.

The San Francisco Bay Area 9/11 Truth Film Festival is presented by The Northern California 9/11 Truth Alliance. Scroll to end for two key films


New Books

Ray McGinnis Unanswered Questions. The author starts with the original list of questions presented by 9/11 relatives and finds that very few have been answered.

Jamie Mcphail. 9/11: Unravelling the Lies. A carefully researched update of a wide range of 9/11 issues will go online soon.This is a carefully researched update of a wide range of 9/11 issues

Ian Henshall. His 9.11 The New Evidence has been overhauled and updated and will be published by global publishing giant Little, Brown as an eBook.

Andy Steele. Born on 9/11 Graphic novelKevin Langdon was born the same day his father, a firefighter, died saving lives in the World Trade Center... this book by 9/11 radio host has received glowing reviews.

Lars Schall, German financial journalist has published a pair of detailed books on the money flows of 911 including insider trading issues

Internet resources


Directed by Dylan Avery, narrated by Hollywood legend Ed Asner, Produced by Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, 2020. Gone in less than seven seconds. Building 7 was not hit by an airplane. But at 5:20 pm on 9/11, it fell symmetrically into its footprint in the exact manner of a carefully planned controlled demolition. Why was the evidence removed from the scene before it could be examined? why did government investigators never consider the possibility of explosives? Did fires really bring down this 47-story skyscraper?

Years later, with doubts about the government’s story still lingering, an engineering professor from the University of Alaska, Fairbanks decided to find out. Leroy Hulsey and his team spent four years modeling the structure to determine what could and could not have caused the perfectly symmetrical collapse. Their conclusion challenges all of us to see 9/11 – and the world – in a new light.

9/11: Decade of Deception

A documentary of the Toronto Hearings on 9/11. On the tenth anniversary of the Attacks of September 11th, 2001, expert witnesses gathered at Ryerson University in Toronto, Canada to provide evidence-based research that called into question the official story of 9/11.
Over a period of four days, these experts in Structural Engineering, Physics, Chemistry, and History gave researched and professional testimony to an international panel of distinguished judges. The panel of judges, in conjunction with the steering committee would go on to publish their final analysis of the evidence provided, which called for a new investigation into the Attacks of September 11th, 2001. This version is from highlights of The Toronto Hearings on 9/11, which were renamed and edited by Press for Truth in 2015.

>From Reinvestigate 9/11