If you’ve got
about 45 minutes, the following four videos are a great place to start
(or continue) your journey into 9/11 Truth. The coverage is broad, in
the context of the AE911Truth focus on the WTC skyscraper collapses.
Arguably the
best 15-minute introduction to 9/11 Truth on the web. Ed Asner and
AE911Truth founder Richard Gage host a quick overview of some of the
best evidence for controlled demolition of the WTC skyscrapers on 9/11.
Family members of some of the 9/11 victims voice their support for a new
9/11 investigation. Some interesting television news clips complete the
package.
A visually
impressive video focusing on the collapse of WTC-1, the North Tower.
High school physics teacher David Chandler adds commentary to a
continuously looping video of the collapse, pointing out facts that are
not consistent with the U.S. government’s explanation for the collapse.
By the time the video is over, the viewer will likely recognize
explosive aspects of the building’s destruction that were previously not
known to them.
Coverage of
WTC-7, Building 7, free fall, arguably the most compelling evidence for
controlled demolition of the WTC skyscrapers on 9/11. In this part 3 of a
3-part video, narrator David Chandler focuses on the ramifications of
the admission of Building 7 free fall by NIST, the U.S. National
Institute of Standards & Technology.
Coverage of
thermite, an incendiary whose fingerprint has been found throughout the
WTC crime scene. Engineer Jonathan Cole responds to 9/11 Truth debunkers
who claim thermite was incapable of destroying the WTC buildings on
9/11. Through trial and error experiments using store-bought materials,
Cole disproves these claims by building an effective thermate device
that produces demolition-quality cuts of representative steel beams
(thermate is thermite plus sulfur).
If you
instead prefer to get your 9/11 Truth from a single mouse click, another
good option is to watch the following single hour-long video.
An abridged version of the 97-minute Experts Speak Out documentary described below.
Depth-First Quick Start
If you’ve got
about an hour and want what many consider the 9/11 Truth Movement’s
“top gun” evidence (rather than a smorgasbord of information), Building 7
free fall is a great place to start. The following links cover the
free-fall evidence, as well as the U.S. government’s response to this
evidence.
All of the
parts of David Chandler’s 3-part video brought together into a single
package. Part 1 begins with the initial cover up and denial of Building 7
free fall by NIST, the U.S. government investigating agency. This is
followed by the eventual NIST acceptance of free fall in their final
report. Part 2 exposes the questionable manner in which NIST measured
the building collapse time. Part 3, repeating from above, covers the
ramifications of NIST’s admission of 2.25 seconds of free fall.
A summary of
NIST’s account of the collapse of Building 7 taken from their final
report. NIST claims that their “Probable Collapse Sequence” was produced
by a computer model of the building, its structural damage, and fires.
Of particular note is the “Initiating Event,” where a group of thermally
expanding beams are claimed to push a girder off its seat on column 79
of the building.
Attorney
William Pepper’s letter to the U.S. Commerce Department demanding
correction of errors identified in the NIST final report. The supporting
technical segment details NIST’s inadequate response to some of the
errors pointed out by independent engineers who reviewed the report.
This includes NIST’s unjustified adjustment of the beam thermal
expansion, from 5.5 inches to 6.25 inches, in response to a corrected
column seat width from 11 to 12 inches. It also covers NIST’s admission
that its model omits “flange stiffener plates” identified in the
building’s structural drawings by independent engineers. NIST’s claim
that these unmodeled structural elements would not resist NIST’s failure
mode is shown to be contradicted by structural analysis.
Video
coverage of the topic of NIST’s failure to model the flange stiffener
plates. The video does a good job of helping the viewer to visualize
NIST’s claimed failure mode and the role that the stiffener plates would
play in resisting this failure.
The Probable
Collapse Sequence and its Initiating Event are behaviors that NIST
“claims” occurred in the real Building 7 on 9/11, based on their
computer modeling of the building collapse. The behaviors will remain
“claimed behaviors” as long as they cannot be properly certified by
independent building professionals. NIST refuses to release their
modeling data so that it can be independently evaluated for accuracy;
therfore, we have no way of knowing whether the NIST model is accurate.
NIST has also failed to report any experimental validation of the key,
first-of-a-kind behavior said to be produced by their model. This is not
the way that engineering teams in the real world treat unexpected and
unprecedented behavior produced by computer models. Fundamental mistakes
at the very heart of the Initiating Event have been identified by
independent engineers — correcting these mistakes would invalidate the
NIST collapse scenario. Since this area of the model should have been
one of the most thoroughly reviewed by NIST engineers, there is no
reason to trust any conclusions of NIST that are not independently
checked by outside experts.
Analysis of Government Reports
Documentaries
The latest
documentary from AE911Truth (2012). The video features testimony from
technical professionals explaining why the official 9/11 story cannot be
true and a new investigation is needed. The presented evidence covers
the WTC Twin Towers, Building 7, and the ground zero dust and debris
piles. Problems with the official investigations of the WTC building
collapses are covered. Testimony from professionals in psychology
explain some peoples’ resistance to exploring the 9/11 evidence. Family
members of 9/11 victims explain why they want a new investigation.
A tour de
force from Massimo Mazzucco. This documentary begins by making the
comparison between the attacks of 9/11 and those on Pearl Harbor in
1941. The video covers a large range of evidence that contradicts the
official story of 9/11, including the air defense failures on 9/11, the
identity of the hijackers and the airplanes, the Pentagon and
Shanksville crashes, and the Twin Tower and Building 7 collapses. The
sections on the Twin Towers and Building 7 use material from AE911Truth,
and are endorsed by AE911Truth.
